Thursday, December 7, 2017

Same Old Thinking, Different Era


 " I can't keep up with what's been going on...I guess my heart must just be slowing down"- Jackson Browne
           We are 'friends' with Saudi Arabia, a culture which until very recently put women in jail for driving a car (read the above book for details on that repressive society), and in Alabama many voters would rather put a borderline pedophile in power than 'lose' an election to a Democrat. There seems to be a lack of moral compass among those voters that resembles the thinking that had the south supporting slavery. Meanwhile our Supreme Court is debating whether a bake shop owner has the 'religious' right to deny baking a cake for a gay couple. The baker sincerely believes that his interpretation of 'religious freedom' is correct, but I wonder if he asks his other clients whether they beat their wives or children before he serves them. Does his religion not disapprove of those acts at least as fervently as homosexuality? In my experience, a true religion embraces LOVE and unity and equality, not rejection and separation and inequality.
          On a positive note there seems to be a revolution of sorts going on regarding the sexual harassment of women. Perhaps the momentum can translate into genuine change whereby women are paid and promoted the same as men, but I think it will require more women in power to balance those scales.
           Meanwhile our president continues to shake things up simply because he Can. I am waiting for World War III on his watch, and wonder if evangelicals and other supporters will welcome war simply because Trump says it is necessary. His crude style seems to appeal to them regardless of the consequences, although I hope they realize that there will be nowhere to hide if nuclear war comes.
 POSTSCRIPT: Alabama voters decided to remain in the civilized world by rejecting Roy Moore. 
            
            
      

Monday, November 13, 2017

Halloween


       This Halloween Beth and I did a small experiment of sorts by which we set our container of candy on the edge of the porch, just at the top of the stairs. We sat in the chairs and welcomed the kids as they approached and encouraged them to take some. They all did but showed mild hesitation at our unorthodox method and we noticed that only 4 out of 23 children said 'thank you'. So we modified our approach and personally held the candy bucket while on the porch and later when we went back inside the house. In the latter cases all of the children said 'thank you' and seemed much more relaxed about the whole encounter. There was something about holding the candy container that personalized the exchange and made it more specifically from us rather than the impersonal top of the stairs. That so minor a difference would increase the politeness and social 'civility' of the kids was surprising, but real.
    Research has shown that merely holding a warm drink versus a cold drink causes people to regard strangers as more trustworthy, so there are many ways we respond to the world- sometimes unconsciously. This Halloween observation seems to be one of them.

The Fall of Rome



   For several years during the mid 90’s I passed thousands of solitary hours in what the Buddhists would call a “walking meditation”-thinking, and writing, and observing Nature and the world. In that time I experienced states of mind and insights that come only after one has quieted the mind and removed distractions. In science they describe such inspirations as “favoring the prepared mind”.  That is, such ‘discoveries’ are available to anyone who puts in the time and study, for it enables them to see things not apparent to the casual observer. Jane Goodall first observing tool use and extreme violence among chimpanzees is an example.
  One evening in 1996 I had been concentrating on atoms and electrons and photons and trying to figure out how such energy systems related to what we call life and consciousness. Suddenly (… a relative expression, for I had been focusing for over an hour) I experienced a low energy mind state that I had not had before and have not had since. The sensation was as though my mind was suddenly dulled to a foggy, yet still fully alert awareness, at which point I seemed to notice a pervading intelligence in the rocks and other traditionally non living matter. I recall walking another mile in this seemingly lower energy state, questioning its validity, asking the powers that be if I was supposed to accept that there was intelligence in door knobs? Yet I could not deny that this perception was as real as the light striking my retina or the sounds on my eardrum, and I had not noticed it before because I had not heretofore put in the time and effort. In a real sense until that particular walk I was not prepared to experience that insight and would have derided myself as delusional without a second thought. For a scientific comparison, humans were ignorant of many phenomena until we developed the proper instruments to perceive them, but that did not invalidate their reality. They just needed to be discovered. In that way I consider the human mind capable of perceiving many things that cannot necessarily be measured with instruments-yet-but that does not invalidate their reality.
         When thinking on these things there is always skepticism because people sometimes hear voices or experience mind states that are genuinely delusional, yet it is the direct experience of this ‘universal intelligence’ that convinced me of its reality;  no amount of analysis or scientific inquiry since that moment has lessened my conviction. Science and logic no more touch that kind of perception than they touch emotion or explain color to a blind man. No doubt it is a fine line between ‘seeing is believing’ and ‘believing is seeing’, but the line exists and many things require an open mind-not a gullible one.  
          One persistent thought over the years as I have watched the news and contrasted the outer world with the inner states of my solitude is that-in universal terms-we human beings are an immature species. It is profound humility rather than vanity that has me thinking that way, for this so called universal intelligence seems to imply that we have a long way to go to attain the loving, inclusive wisdom that truly defines Creation. If there are no borders, and no superior races, nor species, and an indivisible, unified thread pervading the Universe, then the walls and divisions people put between themselves and other species is the true illusion/delusion. They expose our ignorance regarding the underlying nature of reality. Yet Never have I perceived our immaturity in a negative sense, rather this higher intelligence suggests we are children striving to advance to some better, more loving and tolerant awareness within the Universal stage.
     So I watch the emotionally dysfunctional men in power and it troubles me to know that they have the capacity to launch nuclear weapons. I watch the intolerant, divisive behaviors of racists and homophobes and sexists and religious fanatics and know that they are miles..no, thousands of hours of reflection away from comprehending esoteric ideas like universal intelligence. Because we are each responsible for our own personal growth, I fear such people will never learn humility before it is too late for the planet. As Voltaire observed, “Anyone who has the power to make you believe in absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices.” I do not despair over such things, but mourn for the loss of reason and compassion, and wonder if human nature shall ever rise from this quagmire before we destroy ourselves. So Rome fell after a long flourishing, and in this interconnected, overpopulated, world there is less and less room for bravado and ignorance, yet that is precisely what has gained favor. It is incumbent upon the reasonable to defend truth wherever they must, and I draw upon my long ago meditations for the courage to do so.
    POSTSCRIPT: To that end I am inspired by Aaron Courtney, the man who hugged the Nazi sympathizer in Florida yesterday and asked him "Why do you hate me?", to which the man replied, "I don't know".




Friday, September 22, 2017

More Healthcare Crap

      I have a tongue in cheek saying around the office ( I work part time for my brother in law who is a family practitioner with over 30 years experience) that " It's all crap"- meaning all the bureaucracy and spin that accompanies the modern age. At any rate, in addition to their numerous TV commercials, drug companies also buy time and influence from doctors by purchasing lunch for them and their staff in return for the 'privilege' of talking to the doctor for 20 minutes while everyone eats. So for $70 or $80 per lunch, drug reps come into the office once or twice a week to promote their latest medicine. Some doctors enjoy more free lunches per week and some less, depending on how much they want to be bothered, but my brother in law does it twice for the benefit of his staff. This practice happens thousands of time per day around the country, and one can imagine the unseen perks that politicians are offered to peddle influence.
      Last Tuesday a rep dropped off this paper for the drug Belsomra, a sleeping aid for insomnia. It shows that the PA State employees negotiated a co pay of $18 from the Merck company, and also shows the low tier copay rates that various other entities have negotiated. Below that is an assessment of Belsomra by Consumer Reports, which is one of the few remaining news outlets that has any semblance of objectivity in this day and age.


    Consumer Reports> "We commissioned two drug safety experts—Steven Woloshin, M.D., and Lisa M. Schwartz, M.D., both at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth—to review the research and prepare a Drug Facts Box for Belsomra. Schwartz served on an FDA advisory committee of experts that looked at Belsomra in 2013.
Their analysis shows that people who took a 15 mg or 20 mg dose of Belsomra every night for 3 months fell asleep just 6 minutes faster on average than those who got a placebo pill. And the Belsomra group slept only 16 minutes longer—6 hours and 12 minutes total vs. 5 hours and 56 minutes for the placebo group.
Those small improvements in sleep didn’t translate to people feeling more refreshed. Instead, more people who took Belsomra felt drowsy the next day compared with those who took a placebo.
In fact, two people who took the 20 mg dose the night before were so drowsy the next day they had to stop a driving test. Slightly more people in the Belsomra group were involved in driving accidents or got traffic tickets and reported hallucinations or sleep paralysis—a feeling that you can’t move or talk while falling asleep or awakening.
The 10 mg dose was only studied in 62 people, and it’s unclear whether it improves sleep. Even Merck, the manufacturer of Belsomra, doubts whether it’s better than a placebo. “The overall picture is that 10 milligrams is not an effective dose,” said W. Joseph Herring, M.D., Merck’s executive director of clinical research, neuroscience, and ophthalmology, at the 2013 FDA advisory committee meeting. Yet, the FDA’s internal reviewers said the 10 mg dose improved sleep more than placebo. The bottom line is that the 10 mg dose is probably less effective than the 15 or 20 mg dose and it might not be much better than a placebo pill.
And it’s unknown if the 5 mg dose will help you sleep: It’s not been studied at all.
“The FDA has set a disturbing precedent by approving an untested dose of a drug,” Schwartz says. “For a deadly cancer with limited treatment this gamble might make sense, but not for a condition like insomnia and where Belsomra doesn't appear to work any better, or more safely, than available treatments."
Also, Schwartz and Woloshin worry that if people don’t sleep better with the 5 mg or 10 mg dose, they may take additional doses, increasing the risk of side effects.
If Belsomra’s slight benefit and potential side effects aren’t enough to make you think twice before trying it, consider it’s high price tag: about $70 for 7 pills. That’s more than four times the cost of the same amount of our Best Buy pick, zolpidem, the generic version of Ambien. Our Best Buy Drugs report found that people who took zolpidem fell asleep 20 minutes faster and slept 34 minutes longer on average than those who took a placebo&lt."<<
      .... So, as the information indicates, the price of medicines follows a flexible scale depending on what the Healthcare companies or corporations or governments are willing to pay, and the drug companies negotiate because they want to have their drug accessible to the millions of people in a particular insurance plan, corporation, or government entity  . If they don't negotiate, a rival drug maker will do so and that drug will become the drug of choice. This is capitalism behind the scenes-nothing illegal- but then again not exactly on the evening news or out front in political healthcare discussions. What is unethical-but again perfectly legal-occurs when drug companies whose brand name medication patent is about to expire, file frivolous new patents by changing a minor ingredient or a minor step in the manufacturing procedure. This effectively shuts out and delays generic drug makers from introducing a cheaper version of the drug. Happens all the time and explains some of the high cost of drugs and the decades long absence of some generics.
      ...and I hope everyone saw the October 15th episode of 60 minutes in which Republicans Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Tom Marino of Pennsylvania were exposed for the blood they have on their hands for their support of a bill that stripped the DEA of the legal power to stop drug distributors-primarily Mckesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen-from oversupplying opioids to bogus pharmacies. Your government and capitalism at their worst...What does all the scheming and double dealing mean?...besides the consumer being screwed and people dying?...... 'It's all crap...'

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Camping in Luxury

  Beth and I bought our used 'B' size motor home this summer and have gone out a couple of times to test things out. We really have not used the systems much so far, although it is nice to have a secure roof and a toilet when necessary.  The main purpose of this vehicle will be to travel for weeks at at time with the freedom to stop anywhere and sleep without the expense of hotel rooms. A larger motor home cannot be parked in a normal size parking space, and a trailer or tent would mean the hassle of finding a campground- restrictions on both freedom and expense. This vehicle(a 1997 Leisure Travel) has a toilet, stove, sink, heater, air conditioner, fridge, shower, microwave, generator, lights and one of the best sound systems I have ever heard in a vehicle. The Dodge 318 motor and other mechanical systems seem to have been well maintained. I cannot understand the "tiny house' phenomenon in which people spend tens of thousands of dollars for a static home when used motor homes or trailers can be had for less than $10,000-$20,000. At any rate, we look forward to many pleasurable miles exploring the country in the coming years and count our blessings that we may have the health and wealth to do so.

Sunday, September 3, 2017

Song Lyrics

    In the 70's, when the songs first came out, Steve Millers 'Jet Airliner' had the lyric: "I don't want to get caught up in any of that funky shit going down in the city". The Pink Floyd song ' Money' had the line "goody good bullshit"  and in 'Life in the Fast Lane' the Eagles sang "haven't seen a goddamn thing"... all lyrics that I have heard changed ( 'funky kicks') or censored in today's airplay. With all the blatant sexuality and cursing on TV, the internet and in other forms of media, this seems like unnecessary puritanism to me. Of course in those days some radio stations blacklisted "Sympathy for the Devil" by the Stones and other songs, so I guess every era has sensitive things that both earlier and later generations question. In the late 60's a radio station would play the entire 17 minute version of Iron Butterfly's 'In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida.' as well, which would never happen in the corporate controlled homogeneity that passes for music these days.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Healthcare



      This is a letter to editor I recently published:


  >'Rather than listen to all the misinformation being bantered about by politicians regarding the American healthcare system, I strongly suggest that everyone simply read the book “An American Sickness- How Healthcare Became Big Business and How You Can Take It Back” by Dr. Elisabeth Rosenthal. It is available in the Warren public library. As both a doctor and investigative reporter, Dr. Rosenthal offers a meticulously researched account of how healthcare in this country has metastasized into a system which, as she states “…has stopped focusing on health or even science. Instead it attends more or less single-mindedly to its own profits.”  She then backs up that claim with example after example of how hospitals, drug companies, insurance companies, individual doctors, and administrators have gamed the system to maximize profits-often knowingly to the detriment of patient care. This unfortunate deterioration started long before Obamacare or whatever new plan the Republicans come up with. In fact, one economist in the book, Glenn Melnick, states that “It (healthcare) is now so dysfunctional that I sometimes think the only solution is to blow the whole thing up.”  That is the exact same quote I hear from some of the most experienced healthcare workers I talk to right here in Warren. So if anyone genuinely wants the facts regarding American healthcare rather than ignorant sound bites, please read the book and encourage whatever lawmaker you support from either party to do the same.'<

..............and some other reflections:
              A recent tweet by a mother outlining the $200,000 plus hospital bill for her sick son exposed several things about the American healthcare system, and wealth distribution in general. Since 1982 the wealthiest 400 people have increased their worth from a collective 80 billion to 2.4 trillion. One of them, Warren Buffett, admitted in a PBS interview that a proposed version of the Republican health care bill would reduce his tax bill by $679,999, or 17%. His worth according to Forbes is over 75 billion, on which he paid a 16.3% tax rate in 2016.
    That tax on people with incomes over $200,000  is currently helping pay the subsidies for Obama care. At the same time many Insurance companies’ stock price and profits have gone up despite their having dropped out of certain markets, raised premiums and diversified their businesses. So there has been a lot of money moved around over the last 35 years, some of it to the middle and lower classes in the form of entitlements and much of it to the rich.  
    As for the mother and her son, his hospital stay required about a third of the $679,999 of Mr. Buffet’s tax payment, which he freely admits he does not need. The mother paid a $500co-pay. As a society the decision becomes whether to give the wealthy-both individuals and corporations- their money back or save the kids life. Because as a people we have decided to save infants at all costs without having a clear system to pay for them , the life and death decisions have shifted from the mother-who if she did not have insurance would have watched her child die-to the rest of us. The  inefficiency in the health care industry contributes to the dysfunction, but so do 90 year olds who receive extensive lab tests and recurring hospitalizations. Do they deserve to have all their bills paid, or should we refer them to priests instead? Is a premature infant who would die within hours without receiving a million dollars of care worth the expense? Should corporations and individuals pay for that level of care or should nature be allowed to take its course? Those are the realities this country-and individuals- have not been able to reconcile, and meanwhile we debate and debate and move money around without really solving
anything.

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Redneck Wedding

   I do not know this man. I do not know his daughter. I do know that he refused to wear dress clothes to his only daughters wedding despite her requests. " I'll wear a tux when they plant ( bury) me." His concession was that he agreed to remove his hat as he approached the pastor while walking her up the aisle. He was responsible for having the music but never tested the equipment so that did not work as planned. He refused to travel 3/4 mile back to the house to retrieve her veil which she forgot. The house is the brides grandmothers, who lives there without running water at the edge of a field., and the grandmother is the woman who mostly raised her.
   The bride and groom did most of the work for the wedding and reception, both located at a rural fire hall. They were our of their depth and should have planned smaller, but considering the father's attitude it was remarkable they accomplished anything at all. She had lost her job at Dollar General just days before the ceremony, and the groom works part time at McDonalds, so their stress on what should have been a joyous day was palpable.
   I mention all this because unless one witnesses it, is difficult for "normal"- meaning intellectually and emotionally functional people- to understand how many people in this country still live.   
  The fathers dysfunction- which he would never admit to nor even recognize- has nothing to do with the poverty of this area, for there are echoes of dysfunction everywhere, even in the White House. Such behavior is somehow thought to be normal among peers, and the victims are all of the unfortunate children raised by similar macho or matriarchal narcissists. 

Sunday, May 14, 2017

More oil and gas ruminations


 This is how oil and gas recovery is done in the Allegheny national forest and surrounding mountains. The pump jacks-some decades old and others brand new- number in the thousands, connected by dirt roads and ATV tracks by which the owners check them. The jacks are powered by electricity or gasoline, diesel, propane or natural gas, and are scattered throughout the forest. Power sheds shelter engines of one kind or another to burn the fuel to generate the electricity for the pumps and are located in isolated areas, and electric lines fan out to the pumps. The lines are often attached to trees with nylon rope and propped up with 'Y' shaped branches where they cross open areas. I have not noticed any leaking current in all my walks, so this crude system seems to work and at any rate is cheap and fast to erect.
     The oil is pumped to holding tanks such as in the picture, around which a dirt berm is built to contain potential leaks. Sometimes small ponds are near the tanks, although I am not sure what their purpose is. This is not fracking water and is clean enough to support salamanders.  When the tanks are full, oil is transferred to a refinery. The raw natural gas is often piped to large transfer stations where it can be purified and sent on to consumers. As the pictures to the right show these pipes are strung across rivers and diverted back underground all across the landscape. Thousands of miles of old and new pipe are buried or laying on the surface, and the smell of gas can be noticed near some jacks and tanks, but is not usually offensive. Neither have I heard of any explosions or major leaks in the field since I moved here ten years ago. As I mentioned in earlier posts the oil and logging roads and ATV trails offer the only hiking and biking access to much of the forest around here, and time quickly erodes and covers them over with vegetation when they are abandoned.
     I am not necessarily pro fossil fuel, but neither am I a hypocrite, for I burn oil and gas for my transportation and  Beth and I heat the house with natural gas.( Solar power simply is unfeasible in this cloudy part of the country) Observing all the controversy surrounding oil and gas exploration, I also see the healing power of time, and know that nature doesn't give a shit about human beings in the long run. If we kill ourselves one way or another, we will be just one more failed species. The mountains around Warren were totally stripped of trees and filled with oil derricks in the 19th century, and some of the rivers were filled with more spilled oil than water. Today those same rivers are well regarded trout streams and the mountains are forested over. I am more concerned about the invisible pollutants and pesticides that seem to do all kinds of  insidious damage, and the sheer scale of the human population. Yet with all the potential threats to the planet it is still best to take care of your own little space and live by example. Although I do not see the average American changing their lifestyle much, eventually reality has a way of prevailing either way.

Spring

   Flowers, fishing, and maple syrup...I love this season and it's promise of warmth and renewal and outside recreation. Rain and cool weather have the rivers running high and the canopy a little delayed, but there is no stopping the turning of the Earth!

Sunday, May 7, 2017

Why Climate Change Matters


     It is hard to know what the future will bring, but mass extinctions in the past have been related to high CO2 levels which raised ocean temperatures which lowered Oxygen levels, so all those people denying climate science hold their descendants well being in their decisions.

  Decades of data on world's oceans reveal a troubling oxygen decline

Date:
May 4, 2017
Source:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Summary:
The amount of dissolved oxygen contained in the water -- an important measure of ocean health -- has been declining for more than 20 years, reveals a new analysis of decades of data on oceans across the globe.



A new analysis of decades of data on oceans across the globe has revealed that the amount of dissolved oxygen contained in the water -- an important measure of ocean health -- has been declining for more than 20 years.
Researchers at Georgia Institute of Technology looked at a historic dataset of ocean information stretching back more than 50 years and searched for long term trends and patterns. They found that oxygen levels started dropping in the 1980s as ocean temperatures began to climb.
"The oxygen in oceans has dynamic properties, and its concentration can change with natural climate variability," said Taka Ito, an associate professor in Georgia Tech's School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences who led the research. "The important aspect of our result is that the rate of global oxygen loss appears to be exceeding the level of nature's random variability."
The study, which was published April in Geophysical Research Letters, was sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The team included researchers from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the University of Washington-Seattle, and Hokkaido University in Japan.
Falling oxygen levels in water have the potential to impact the habitat of marine organisms worldwide and in recent years led to more frequent "hypoxic events" that killed or displaced populations of fish, crabs and many other organisms.
Researchers have for years anticipated that rising water temperatures would affect the amount of oxygen in the oceans, since warmer water is capable of holding less dissolved gas than colder water. But the data showed that ocean oxygen was falling more rapidly than the corresponding rise in water temperature.
"The trend of oxygen falling is about two to three times faster than what we predicted from the decrease of solubility associated with the ocean warming," Ito said. "This is most likely due to the changes in ocean circulation and mixing associated with the heating of the near-surface waters and melting of polar ice."
The majority of the oxygen in the ocean is absorbed from the atmosphere at the surface or created by photosynthesizing phytoplankton. Ocean currents then mix that more highly oxygenated water with subsurface water. But rising ocean water temperatures near the surface have made it more buoyant and harder for the warmer surface waters to mix downward with the cooler subsurface waters. Melting polar ice has added more freshwater to the ocean surface -- another factor that hampers the natural mixing and leads to increased ocean stratification.
"After the mid-2000s, this trend became apparent, consistent and statistically significant -- beyond the envelope of year-to-year fluctuations," Ito said. "The trends are particularly strong in the tropics, eastern margins of each basin and the subpolar North Pacific."
In an earlier study, Ito and other researchers explored why oxygen depletion was more pronounced in tropical waters in the Pacific Ocean. They found that air pollution drifting from East Asia out over the world's largest ocean contributed to oxygen levels falling in tropical waters thousands of miles away.
Once ocean currents carried the iron and nitrogen pollution to the tropics, photosynthesizing phytoplankton went into overdrive consuming the excess nutrients. But rather than increasing oxygen, the net result of the chain reaction was the depletion oxygen in subsurface water.
That, too, is likely a contributing factor in waters across the globe, Ito said.

Friday, May 5, 2017

Ivanka's Book

    - I have not read it yet, but if this review is accurate then my previous hope that Ivanka Trump can temper her daddys presidency and help the plight of working women is mistaken...

     "Ivanka Trump, a daughter of and aide to the man whose election drove women to mount the largest protest in American history, has published a new book. It’s about how women can best achieve personal satisfaction and professional success. This is an ill-advised endeavor, in theory. In practice, it is an even worse idea than it seems.
In the preface to the book—titled “Women Who Work,” after an “initiative” she launched, in 2014—Ivanka emphasizes that she wrote it before Donald Trump became President. She has since announced that she will donate the profits and refrain from publicizing the book “through a promotional tour or media appearances,” in the hopes of avoiding the appearance of ethical conflicts. (Instead, she has been shilling for the book on Twitter, where she has nearly four million followers.) Nonetheless, it is immediately obvious that circumstances have gotten entirely away from her. When Ivanka published her first book, “The Trump Card,” she was twenty-eight, and her air of oblivious diligence was a reasonable fit for her position as a hardworking heiress, the favored child of a celebrity tycoon. Now that her father is the President and she has assumed a post in the White House, it feels downright perverse to watch her devote breathless attention to the self-actualization processes at work in the lives of wealthy women while studiously ignoring the political forces that shape even those lives.
“Women Who Work” is mostly composed of artless jargon (“All women benefit immeasurably by architecting their lives”) and inspirational quotes you might find by Googling “inspirational quotes.” Her exhortations feel even emptier than usual in light of Trump’s stated policy goals. “We must fight for ourselves, for our rights not just as workers but also as women,” Ivanka writes, and, elsewhere, “Honor yourself by exploring the kind of life you deserve.” The imagined audience for the book is so rarefied that Ivanka confidently calls paying bills and buying groceries “not enormously impactful” to one’s daily productivity. Her nannies are mentioned twice, if you count the acknowledgments; no other household help is alluded to at all. On the book’s second-to-last page, she finally, briefly mentions the need for paid leave and affordable childcare.
The notion that Ivanka’s reticence on political issues conceals an innate goodness and a sort of strategic genius that can only be deployed behind the scenes has been crumbling since November. As I wrote last year in a piece about her previous book, Ivanka possesses a type of beauty that often passes as moral uprightness; she speaks carefully, making some portion of her audience believe that she must act carefully, too. But “Women Who Work” should put an end to the idea that Ivanka is particularly self-aware. In the book’s third paragraph, she assesses her father’s Presidential run by saying, “I have grown tremendously as a person.” Later, she laments not “treating myself to a massage or making much time for self-care” during the campaign. She warns the reader of the dangers of one’s inner circle turning into an echo chamber.
What’s more striking is that the book fails even to get its own story straight: Which came first, Ivanka’s women’s-empowerment initiative or her desire to sell more shoes? The initiative evolved “very organically,” she writes. And yet throughout the book she reverts to the tone of a pitch deck: “I designed my company around a larger mission. Whether you’re trying on a pair of my heels or perusing my Web site for interviewing tips, my ‘why’ is to provide you—a woman who works—with solutions and inspiration.” A few pages later, she describes her entry into the fashion business as a “market opportunity . . . ready to be seized.” The book ultimately doesn’t try very hard to obscure the fact that the Women Who Work initiative was created, as the Times recently reported, as a way to make Ivanka products more marketable. She seems unwilling to acknowledge—if this is something that she has even grasped in the first place—that there could, hypothetically, be a difference between what’s good for women and what’s good for her brand.
In “The Trump Card,” which was published in 2009, Ivanka broadcasts her similarity to her father. “That’s what you get from this particular Daddy’s girl,” she writes at one point. In “Women Who Work,” she praises Trump but positions herself as separate from him. The section dividers in the book are pale pink and meant to be Instagrammed, with elaborately lettered quotes from other people labelled #ITWiseWords; she recommends graciousness, family time, and the cultivation of “brain-boosting hobbies” such as chess and calligraphy. Nonetheless, on occasion, she sounds quite a bit like the President. “When it comes to business, whatever it is I’m doing, I’m incredibly dedicated to creating solutions for modern women who are living full, multidimensional lives,” she writes. The book is full of random advertisements for Trump companies, like this one: “Scion Hotels offer energized social experiences and shared work spaces designed to bring people together to exchange ideas and create.” Sometimes Ivanka even deploys Trump’s comically obtuse diction: “I personally love the word ‘curious.’ I identify with it quite a bit because I am deeply curious.”

As was true of her previous book, there’s very little advice in “Women Who Work” that is specific to women. A reading list at the back contains fifty-three books and TED Talk recommendations—thirty-nine of which were authored by men. There’s no shortage of woman-targeted branding throughout the book—“You are a woman who works,” Ivanka writes, over and over again—but the first actual mention of a gendered situation occurs on page ninety-four, when she notes that women, more than men, can face negative repercussions when they try to negotiate a raise. Her counsel, though, is entirely general: do your research; prove your worth. On page one hundred and four, she finally lays out a woman-specific suggestion: we should be more like men and apply for jobs for which we’re not completely qualified. Given the circumstances, it’s almost funny. In a later section on work/life balance—a “myth,” according to Ivanka, who nonetheless advocates finding a “work/life rhythm that’s optimal for you”—there’s quite a bit of advice about working through and around pregnancy and motherhood, mostly in the form of quotes from Rosie Pope, an entrepreneur who briefly had her own Bravo show called “Pregnant in Heels.”
The other quoted experts—and there are hundreds—are all over the map. There’s Stephen Covey, the business consultant and teacher who wrote “7 Habits of Highly Effective People.” There’s Socrates. There’s Toni Morrison, who is quoted as saying, “Bit by bit, she had claimed herself. Freeing yourself was one thing, claiming ownership of that freed self was another.” (Ivanka does not note that those lines are from the novel “Beloved” and refer to freedom from actual slavery; in this context, they are used as the chapter divider before a section on time management, in which she asks women, “Are you a slave to your time or the master of it?”) There’s Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the feminist author and activist who once wrote, Ivanka has learned, “Life is a verb, not a noun.” There’s a woman with a food blog “dedicated to turning veggies and fruit into spiralized noodles” who appears to offer advice on resilience.
Amid this chorus, Ivanka avoids going into detail about her fashion business, which, as is clear from other reporting, is not the alluring retail juggernaut she sketches here. Sales are uneven: her clothing has been dropped by retailers and relabelled by the factory. Marissa Kraxberger, one of the Ivanka Trump employees who helped create Women Who Work, has said that she “fought long and hard” to get Ivanka to agree to give her eight weeks’ paid maternity leave; Kraxberger was part of an initial team of five senior executives, four of whom have since left the brand.
Like “The Trump Card,” “Women Who Work” is written for an audience whose greatest obstacles are internal, and Ivanka’s advice is, once again, Ivanka-specific. Where, as a twentysomething, she advised women to go into the office on Sundays, she now counsels women to ask for flextime and commit to sending e-mails at night. By the end of the book, she’s basically speaking to no one. Wealthy upper managers with families don’t need to be reminded of the importance of setting goals, and Ivanka’s directives are utterly irrelevant to anyone struggling to pay for childcare and housing at the same time. Women outside the corporate world and creative class do not figure into her vision of endless upward mobility at all. In one chapter, she writes, with a sense of courage that is jaw-droppingly misplaced, “If I can help celebrate the fact that I’m a superengaged mom and unabashedly ambitious entrepreneur, that yes, I’m on a construction site in the morning and at the dinner table with my kids in the evening, I’m going to do that.” And why wouldn’t she? Who wouldn’t celebrate that level of ability and accomplishment—except, maybe, the type of man who would say that putting your wife to work is a dangerous thing? The fundamental dishonesty of Ivanka Trump’s book is clearest in the fact that she never acknowledges the difficulty of knowing, or being governed by, anyone like that."

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Reality Check


....a government based on misinformation and lack of analytical thinking.... wonder where this will lead the good ole' USA this time...The scary thing is that 1/2 the country blindly follow and believe the crap without looking deeper.. as for overall crime including murders.. It is All down substantially in the last 25 years..Just read the World Almanac for 2017 to get the facts

No link between immigration and increased crime, four decades of evidence finds

Date:
February 10, 2017
Source:
University at Buffalo
Summary:
Political discussions about immigrants often include the claim that there is a relationship between immigration patterns and increased crime. However, results of a new study find no links between the two. In fact, immigration actually appears to be linked to reductions in some types of crimes, according to the findings.
Share:
FULL STORY

“The results show that immigration does not increase assaults and, in fact, robberies, burglaries, larceny, and murder are lower in places where immigration levels are higher,” says Robert Adelman, associate professor of sociology, University at Buffalo.

    Political discussions about immigrants often include the claim that there is a relationship between immigration patterns and increased crime. However, results of a University at Buffalo-led study find no links between the two. In fact, immigration actually appears to be linked to reductions in some types of crimes, according to the findings.
"Our research shows strong and stable evidence that, on average, across U.S. metropolitan areas crime and immigration are not linked," said Robert Adelman, an associate professor of sociology at UB and the paper's lead author. "The results show that immigration does not increase assaults and, in fact, robberies, burglaries, larceny, and murder are lower in places where immigration levels are higher.
"The results are very clear."
Adelman's study with Lesley Williams Reid, University of Alabama; Gail Markle, Kennesaw State University; Charles Jaret, Georgia State University; and Saskia Weiss, an independent scholar, is published in the latest issue of the Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice.
"Facts are critical in the current political environment," said Adelman. "The empirical evidence in this study and other related research shows little support for the notion that more immigrants lead to more crime."
Previous research, based on arrest and offense data, has shown that, overall, foreign-born individuals are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans, according to Adelman.
For the current study, the authors stepped back from the study of individual immigrants and instead explored whether larger scale immigration patterns in communities could be tied to increases in crime due to changes in cities, such as fewer economic opportunities or the claim that immigrants displace domestic workers from jobs.
The authors drew a sample of 200 metropolitan areas as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau and used census data and uniform crime reporting data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a 40-year period from 1970 to 2010.
"This is a study across time and across place and the evidence is clear," said Adelman. "We are not claiming that immigrants are never involved in crime. What we are explaining is that communities experiencing demographic change driven by immigration patterns do not experience significant increases in any of the kinds of crime we examined. And in many cases, crime was either stable or actually declined in communities that incorporated many immigrants."
Adelman says the relationship between immigration and crime is complex and more research needs to be done, but this research supports other scholarly conclusions that immigrants, on the whole, have a positive effect on American social and economic life.
"It's important to base our public policies on facts and evidence rather than ideologies and baseless claims that demonize particular segments of the U.S. population without any facts to back them up," said Adelman.


Saturday, February 11, 2017

More Winter Tracks

  Beth and I saw these bizarre tracks during a walk last week, made by coyotes dragging something along the road. They appeared almost like a single snowboard track with paw prints, and occasionally disappeared as if the animals had lifted whatever they were carrying for a time then dropped it again. At places the tracks looked more like the dragging tail of some animal the coyotes were carrying in their mouths. There was no sign of blood but because they do not give birth until spring the animal was likely a kill. After emerging from the woods the tracks followed the road for about 1/4 mile then reentered the woods and and continued up a hill.
   Tracks locally are mostly deer, coyote, fox and, surprisingly to me at least, feral cats. The latter are more abundant than I would have thought, for their tracks can be found miles from civilization.
   The sawmill is where local Amish have harvested some trees and cut the lumber in the woods, which is much easier than trying to drag the  heavy logs by horse power alone. They use small gas powered engines to run the saw-allowed by their faith for this purpose-then use the wood to make sheds and furniture and other items they sell to the general public. By contrast, modern logging involves huge tractors and buzz saws that can fell a tree in seconds, which are loaded onto trucks and shipped to commercial mills.


Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Just another walk



  January 30-  Went for a six mile walk on the mostly dirt roads near Lander, PA, where the land opens up from mountain to to field some ten miles northwest of Warren. This was a routine walk in the sense that I have walked a thousand others like it, and like many walks the first and last miles were the most demanding both mentally and physically. That is, this walk was neither mentally nor physically demanding compared to some, but the first mile always requires discipline and a few minutes to acclimate to temperature and movement after sitting in the car on the way to the starting point, and the last mile requires some effort because I am growing tired and see the finish line. At any rate, the temperature was about 25F and the sky was a typical western PA winter sky, with minutes of sun being disrupted by black clouds that erupted into heavy snow squalls that in summer would have been heavy downpours lasting 15 or 20 minutes. During the January thaw a few days ago the sky did not change, only the temperature, so there was two weeks of intermittent showers rather than snow, and that is typical of the weather here. Last summer I saw an otter cross this road where it passes over a small stream, so despite the open landscape it is close enough to wild, wooded areas to support some unique animals.
     The dog was able to run unleashed on these roads because of proper training and because traffic was very light-we passed only four cars in the entire walk. She did not and does not react much to snow, although it restricts her running if it is too deep, so she buried her head into the drifts and pounced after voles that she smelled, but never caught anything. As a routine walk the two hours was for exercise as much as inspiration, and the most memorable aspect was when, from a distance of about 1/2 mile from the car, I briefly mistook a guardrail for a human being. My elevated position made the forty foot long rail appear condensed into the vertical form of a person, so it required a few moments of watching to see if the form moved, and then as I walked closer I was able to see the illusion. Probably aliens have been mistaken by people seeing such mundane things.

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Trump, Science and America




   (Time.com) "Soon after Donald Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, the official White House website purged all mentions of climate from the site—all mentions but one, that is, if you consider a promise to eliminate the “harmful and unnecessary” Climate Action Plan. Soon thereafter, scientists and other employees of the EPA and USDA were told not to speak to the public ; a National Park Service Twitter account sent out objective facts, and had them deleted in short order; and the EPA was told to take down its climate-change page. This all hewed to Trump's campaign rhetoric, but it was shocking nonetheless. Seeing the 180-degree shift away from the science of the Obama administration was a stark reminder of the dangerous, ever-rising waters in which we now find ourselves. It isn’t just climate science. Trump may appoint an anti-vaccine activist to run a commission on immunization safety, and an anti-regulation zealot to run the Food and Drug Administration. Trump himself has called the fact that asbestos causes cancer a “con” and even refused to believe the objective scientific reality of drought in California."

        (CNSNews.com) – Nearly three-quarters of Americans don’t trust that there is a large “scientific consensus” among climate scientists on human behavior being the cause of climate change, according to an in-depth survey on “the politics of climate” released Tuesday by Pew Research Center. According to the survey, only 27 percent of Americans agree that “almost all” climate scientists say that human behavior is mostly responsible for climate change, while 35 percent say that “more than half” of climate scientists agree on this. An additional 35 percent of those surveyed say that fewer than half (20%) or almost no (15%) climate scientists believe that human behavior is the main contributing factor in climate change... Pew contrasted this to the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which “stated in the forward to its 2013 report, ‘the science now shows with 95 percent certainty that human activity is the dominant cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century."


........The above quotes are more "alternative facts" by our commander in chief..and  the mistrust of science and scientists by Americans generally...really America..is this the best we can do? What or who is to blame for this widespread ignorance...our schools? Facebook? Religion? Whether or not one believes it matters whether or not the climate is changing and whether we can adapt or not, surely facts should matter in deciding our response- or lack thereof -to the scientifically measured rise in atmospheric CO2 over the last century. Yes..we Can move Manhattan eventually and relocate the population of Florida...but if the oceans acidify too much from CO2 absorption we enter uncharted territory as to the effects on global life...Below is the science of global warming for those who care..
  
--"Current rates of ocean acidification have been compared with the greenhouse event at the Paleocene–Eocene boundary (about 55 million years ago) when surface ocean temperatures rose by 5–6 degrees Celsius. No catastrophe was seen in surface ecosystems, yet bottom-dwelling organisms in the deep ocean experienced a major extinction. The current acidification is on a path to reach levels higher than any seen in the last 65 million years,[44] and the rate of increase is about ten times the rate that preceded the Paleocene–Eocene mass extinction. The current and projected acidification has been described as an almost unprecedented geological event.[45] A National Research Council study released in April 2010 likewise concluded that "the level of acid in the oceans is increasing at an unprecedented rate."[46][47] A 2012 paper in the journal Science examined the geological record in an attempt to find a historical analog for current global conditions as well as those of the future. The researchers determined that the current rate of ocean acidification is faster than at any time in the past 300 million years.[48][49]"




Saturday, January 21, 2017

Why Income Disparity Matters

    This is a Scientific American article from 2012 that illustrates how the wealth bubble insulates people from one another and exacerbates bad behavior:

      "Who is more likely to lie, cheat, and steal—the poor person or the rich one? It’s temping to think that the wealthier you are, the more likely you are to act fairly. After all, if you already have enough for yourself, it’s easier to think about what others may need. But research suggests the opposite is true: as people climb the social ladder, their compassionate feelings towards other people decline.
Berkeley psychologists Paul Piff and Dacher Keltner ran several studies looking at whether social class (as measured by wealth, occupational prestige, and education) influences how much we care about the feelings of others. In one study, Piff and his colleagues discreetly observed the behavior of drivers at a busy four-way intersection. They found that luxury car drivers were more likely to cut off other motorists instead of waiting for their turn at the intersection. This was true for both men and women upper-class drivers, regardless of the time of day or the amount of traffic at the intersection. In a different study they found that luxury car drivers were also more likely to speed past a pedestrian trying to use a crosswalk, even after making eye contact with the pedestrian.
     In order to figure out whether selfishness leads to wealth (rather than vice versa), Piff and his colleagues ran a study where they manipulated people’s class feelings. The researchers asked participants to spend a few minutes comparing themselves either to people better off or worse off than themselves financially. Afterwards, participants were shown a jar of candy and told that they could take home as much as they wanted. They were also told that the leftover candy would be given to children in a nearby laboratory. Those participants who had spent time thinking about how much better off they were compared to others ended up taking significantly more candy for themselves--leaving less behind for the children.
     A related set of studies published by Keltner and his colleagues last year looked at how social class influences feelings of compassion towards people who are suffering. In one study, they found that less affluent individuals are more likely to report feeling compassion towards others on a regular basis. For example, they are more likely to agree with statements such as, “I often notice people who need help,” and “It’s important to take care of people who are vulnerable.” This was true even after controlling for other factors that we know affect compassionate feelings, such as gender, ethnicity, and spiritual beliefs.
     In a second study, participants were asked to watch two videos while having their heart rate monitored. One video showed somebody explaining how to build a patio. The other showed children who were suffering from cancer. After watching the videos, participants indicated how much compassion they felt while watching either video. Social class was measured by asking participants questions about their family’s level of income and education. The results of the study showed that participants on the lower end of the spectrum, with less income and education, were more likely to report feeling compassion while watching the video of the cancer patients. In addition, their heart rates slowed down while watching the cancer video—a response that is associated with paying greater attention to the feelings and motivations of others.
   These findings build upon previous research showing how upper class individuals are worse at recognizing the emotions of others and less likely to pay attention to people they are interacting with (e.g. by checking their cell phones or doodling).
    But why would wealth and status decrease our feelings of compassion for others? After all, it seems more likely that having few resources would lead to selfishness. Piff and his colleagues suspect that the answer may have something to do with how wealth and abundance give us a sense of freedom and independence from others. The less we have to rely on others, the less we may care about their feelings. This leads us towards being more self-focused. Another reason has to do with our attitudes towards greed. Like Gordon Gekko, upper-class people may be more likely to endorse the idea that “greed is good.” Piff and his colleagues found that wealthier people are more likely to agree with statements that greed is justified, beneficial, and morally defensible. These attitudes ended up predicting participants’ likelihood of engaging in unethical behavior.
    Given the growing income inequality in the United States, the relationship between wealth and compassion has important implications. Those who hold most of the power in this country, political and otherwise, tend to come from privileged backgrounds. If social class influences how much we care about others, then the most powerful among us may be the least likely to make decisions that help the needy and the poor. They may also be the most likely to engage in unethical behavior. Keltner and Piff recently speculated in the New York Times about how their research helps explain why Goldman Sachs and other high-powered financial corporations are breeding grounds for greedy behavior. Although greed is a universal human emotion, it may have the strongest pull over those of who already have the most."

Thursday, January 12, 2017

January 11

   Writing in my journal on the 7th I noted that it had been "mostly sunny for two days now, the longest stretch of clear sky since early November", which was the result of cold temperatures in the teens and single digits. The dog and I did five miles near Lander, and I overheard passing ATV riders yell to one another, "I can't feel my face!" When the thermometer drops that much I cannot write out of doors with a pen, for even warm ink begins to freeze and skip within a minute. Today it is 40F and the dog and I explore the new logging road we had seen a few weeks ago. It is a loop road switch backing about a mile up the mountain then ending in a clearing where some logging had occurred before the weather turned. A steep cut descends to a lower road that then returns more or less on level ground to complete the circle. These open roads in the woods are used regularly by deer and fox and coyote- wild animals know easy walking when they find it-so some of the tracks proceed almost to the top. But it is a myth that they always prefer moderate angles, and their trails drop off sharply downhill or climb directly up rough ground when they leave the road, probably following territorial boundaries or whatever feeding opportunities arose.
      I had noticed large tracks on the access road, and at first thought they resembled a bear-improbable at this season-then wondered if they could be human or the print of a ski pole dragging in the snow. The thaw had distorted them such that I passed several minutes trying to discern their origin. At length the imprint of a large dog paw was clear in the ice, which confirmed that these odd tracks were the result of the dog running in a manner such that its feet struck the ground immediately behind one another, forming one large print that resembled a different species.


   
  

Thursday, January 5, 2017

1/4/2017
      Mostly clouds with snow showers, 30F The dog and I walk an old pipeline road, more like the towpath of a canal, that parallels the Allegheny between the river and Hemlock road. In places it is as wide as a two lane highway, the surface grass and leaf covered, and I think it was probably a railroad grade that followed the river through Kinzua valley before the dam was built. Today it is maintained by the refining company which has replaced cast iron pipes with more modern ones and provided access points to the macadam road on the ridge above. From this perspective I notice all the trash that has been cast down, some of it very old-galvanized washtubs and the like-and some of it more recent-plastic tubs and lawn chairs. I doubt that future archaeologists will find much of interest here except to indicate the generational habits of human beings.
       A few minutes of sunlight break though the clouds, and during those moments I turn to the sky to deliberately burn the light into my retina. Sunlight in Warren in winter is a rare thing.
1/5
        Snow showers,20F  Work at the office and shop, then walk 4 miles on Morrison Run road 2pm. We follow the tracks of a man who seems distracted, for he meanders back and forth in a slow gait, dragging his left foot on the snow occasionally, and bushwhacking into the woods now and again before reappearing further down the road. I suspect that he is planning or checking a trap line at first, but see him near the end of our walk, when he tells me that he is searching for Chaga, a medicinal fungus that grows on birch trees. He touts its benefits towards longevity and explains that he had climbed "to the the top of the mountain" and back in his search  then found some right where he had parked his truck. I suggest that perhaps the climbing alone will add to his lifespan and he laughs as I leave him to his collecting. Other than the man we see only a few chickadees active in these cold woods, although there is evidence of fox and coyote in the snow. Because of the recurring freezes and thaws the stream is not iced over, and this present ice is apt to melt in next weeks predicted warm temperatures.